Ontario Court Bows to Extreme Transgender Ideology

Says public health must pay for experimental surgery to create a pseudo vagina for a man who claims to be non-binary and wants to keep his penis too

More news on the 33 year old Canadian man, who goes by KS, identifies as non-binary, but leans ‘trans-feminine’ and wanted the the government to pay for a vaginoplasty surgery, while also keeping his penis. He wanted the Ontario Health Insurance Plan (OHIP), ergo, the taxpayer, to pay for the surgery, but OHIP turned him down, because without the removal of the penis it was considered experimental surgery and therefore not covered under OHIP. KS appealed that decision to the Ontario Health Services Appeal and Review Board, who overturned OHIP’s refusal, ruling that a vaginoplasty is among the genital surgeries listed for public coverage and such a surgery should not inherently include a penectomy (removal of the penis). OHIP, in turn, took the case to the Divisional Ontario Superior Court who dismissed it. So, OHIP, again, ergo, Ontario taxpayers will be footing the bill for KS to fly to Austin, Texas, for the surgery to be performed at the Crane Center for Transgender Surgery, which has been nicknamed ‘Frankenstein’s Lab’. The cost of the trip and procedure runs to about $70,000 or more. It should be noted that while KS wants to keep his penis, he has applied to OHIP to approve another surgery to remove his testicles at a later date.

The Divisional Court, in a 3-0 decision ruled, OHIP was obligated to pay for the surgery because the province had incorporated standards written by the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH) into its health insurance law. I guess the court and the province hadn’t heard about the leaked WPATH files that have completely discredited the WPATH as an organization that it has no business providing any type of guidelines or standards of care for gender confused minors or adults because its claim that its standards are evidence based is simply not the case.

Or buy me a coffee with Ko-fi

Now according to a report from Reduxx KS celebrated the court’s decision by going on a Reddit board dedicated to ‘bi-genital’ people, revealing his social media handles, and a few other rather disquieting details about ‘themselves’. KS describes himself as a “non-binary disability advocate” and stated he may go offline at times due to suffering with bipolar disorder. As well as documenting his pursuit to to keep his penis while getting a “vagina,” KS also regularly posts about his mental health issues and sexual fetishes.

In addition to identifying as non-binary, but leaning ‘trans-feminine’, which is why KS felt he needed a ‘vagina’, while keeping his penis, he also identifies as a transgender baby, or what is called paraphilic infantilism, also known as autonepiophilia or an adult baby, who is attracted to diapers. In one post KS reveals that his bedroom is fashioned to look like that of an 8 year old girl, and that he experiences spells where he is obsessed with incontinence. KS also wondered, online, that because he suffers from in incontinence (which he said was voluntary), if it was safe for him to have genital surgery. He then went on to say that he also has Irritable Bowel Syndrome and sometimes defecates on himself. He also expressed suicidal ideation, and revealed that he suffered severe trauma as a result of childhood abuse, and how he is struggling to get adequate mental health support.

Now, it is clear that this person suffers from some other serious mental health issues that go far beyond ‘gender dysphoria’. This includes considering himself an infant, with a diaper fetish and an incontinence fetish, as well as suffering the very serious mental illness of a bipolar disorder, as well as having suffered severe childhood trauma in the form of child abused and he has had suicidal thoughts. Yet, it would appear that the experts, including his endocrinologist and a mental health counsellor who has confirmed he suffers from gender dysphoria, but neglected to mention these other serious mental health disorders in the surgery application documents, think the best option for this person is a complex experimental surgery.

I guess these people also haven’t paid attention to the ongoing issues regarding the problems with this tunnel vision associated with ‘gender affirming care’. That is that an increasing number of medical and psychiatric professionals see it as the ‘only’ solution for someone who is gender confused, while ignoring the fact that the person is clearly suffering from other mental health issues that may be an underlying cause for the confusion. The other issue that very clearly stood out from the leaked WPATH files that even the WPATH practitioners, themselves, recognize, and that is that it is difficult, if not impossible, to get true informed consent for gender reassignment surgeries, first from minors, but also from adults who suffer from serious mental health disorders. These same practitioners, admitted this in the files, yet they still go ahead and perform the surgeries. This is why those who have reviewed the WPATH files have concluded their so called ‘standards of care’ are experimental, not evidence-based, and are extremely unethical.

So here we have a mentally ill man who suffers from a variety of mental health issues, not to mention some physical health conditions, who has had health experts approve a complex surgery to be performed on his genitals that could very well exacerbate his physical conditions. As well, in all likelihood, given his mental condition, it is doubtful that it will resolve his mental health problems, for which he claims he is not getting adequate support for to begin with.

Does anyone not think that the $70,000 for an experimental surgery that may be fraught with complications arising from post-op infections that might require further surgeries and lifetime on hormones, might be better spent addressing this persons’s other mental and physical problems. Can a person in this mental state really give informed consent? It would seem, from this situation that doctors, social workers, health professionals and our courts are so caught up in this ‘woke’ gender ideology they can see nothing else. They are doing exactly what the WPATH doctors have done. They are looking past all of the other underlying mental and in some cases physical health conditions that should be addressed before sending this person for a costly experimental surgery. A surgery that will likely cause them further physical problems, and may not address their mental health issues either. We are halfway to crazy, can someone please make U-turn before we are all the way there?